A record is a season. Not a spray.

What was tried?
What was it compared with?
What happened by harvest?

Every record below is public.

You can read all of it. You cannot tell whose farm it came from.

No farm names. No field boundaries.
No product names. No varieties.
Fewer than five records? Nothing is shown.

Narrow it down.

Every filter describes the question or the conditions, not the commerce. Ask what happened on heavy clay in a wet spring.

You cannot ask what a particular product did. The reason is below.

No filter for product, variety or farm. No free text search. One record cannot tell you whether a product works, so naming one against a single outcome invites a conclusion the evidence will not carry, and drags the contributor into somebody else’s commercial argument. Product and variety performance exists here only in aggregate, with the denominator visible. Free text is left out for a blunter reason: it is the quickest route anyone has found back to a person.

0Illustrative · sample data

Open any record. It slides in from the right and stays on screen while you move through its tabs.

A record holds the whole season, not the moment.

An operation on its own proves nothing.

What makes a record worth anything is that everything around it was held identical on purpose, and written down at the time.

Inside

Every decision on both arms.

Drilling, nutrition, protection, assessment and harvest, for the treatment and the control. Where the arms diverge is marked. Everything else was held the same on purpose.

Which is what turns a difference in the outcome into evidence rather than a coincidence.

Inside

The method, locked before the work.

A protocol declared after the result is known is not a protocol. Standing reaches Protocol locked only where the method was filed first, and the record shows which of the six rungs it earned.

Which is how you tell a designed comparison from a story assembled afterwards.

Withheld

Product and variety names.

One record cannot tell you whether a product works. Publishing a name next to a single outcome invites a conclusion the evidence will not carry. Product performance appears only where there are enough records to mean something, with the denominator attached.

Which is why the aggregate figure, when it comes, is worth quoting.

Absent

Benchmarks and comparisons between records.

Nothing here ranks one record against another. An outcome is shown against its own control arm or its own baseline, and nothing else. Comparing across records is a separate, governed thing with its own rules about who is comparable.

Which is why no record on this page can be quoted out of its own context.

This is the version with the identity taken out.

The contributor sees all of it. So does anyone they have chosen to share with, and every one of those views is logged and can be withdrawn.

Twenty minutes, and we show you the same record from both sides.

The public record of arable evidence
PROOF AG LTD · Company no. 17211914Grosvenor House, 11 St Pauls Square, Birmingham B3 1RB© 2026 Proof